Cold Calling

I love cold calling. This puts me in a minority, even among my peers in sales. In my experience, the individuals who suffer from "call reluctance" focus more on the recipient of their pitch than on themselves.

You're busy. Your prospect is busy. If your prospect doesn't like your pitch they will hang up and forget about you in 20 seconds! If they can move on so easily so can you.

Relying on your current clients to buy all of your ideas is a losing strategy. To grow yourself you must pitch your ideas to new individuals.

To successfully cold calling, you only need 2 things:

1) An Internet browser - one of my former colleagues pointed out that I used to make most of my cold calls with no more information than my prospect's website. Remember, the goal of a cold call is to get a chance to pitch in person

2) Confidence - as discussed in "over qualified," one the biggest reasons for failed pitches is lack of confidence. Lack of belief in your pitch comes through like a air raid siren on the phone and makes hanging up that much easier for your prospect

The rule of thumb I live by is it takes 7 "nos" to get 1 "yes." Sometimes this ratio is lower, sometimes higher, but it helps guide me when I pitch ideas.

Since I'm in the minority, I'm interested in your thoughts on cold calling. Why do you avoid it? What do you do to overcome your reluctance to cold call?

Time and Money

When building a pitch keep in mind that your target audience wants to hear 1 of 2 things.

1) Your idea will save time

2) Your idea will save or make money

Really, the list above is 1 thing, saving/making money. Time savings should save your organization money in the short term and allow it to make more money in the long term through increased productivity.

How your idea will save time or save/make money for your organization may not be readily apparent. On the surface many ideas may not have an obvious connection to the list above.

The chances of your pitch being successful will increase if you take time to look below the surface and connect your pitch to a number that is important to your audience (more on that later).

Profit and loss

To say selling in a recession is hard should elicit eye rolling and something sounding like "duh."

It seems organizations have taken one of two strategies to manage their revenue during the current economic downturn, an aggressive new business development campaign or a conservative "retention" strategy. The former works best for relatively new market entrants, but is unsustainable long term because the reduction in service or value is not enough to maintain clients won over on price. The former sort of works for established market participants; however, while an organization pursuing a "retention" strategy may keep current clients, they won't retain the same level of revenue.

Consider this example. A client who is currently worth $100 per year to your organization says they need to cut costs and may be considering the competition. At best, you can hope to keep that client at $80 per year, but reality is that client will probably be worth between $50-60. Already you are in a $40-50 hole from last year with one client no matter which direction you go.

I feel there are three simple things "retention" organizations can do to actually maintain or grow their revenue in a downturn.

1) Increase service for the same value - keep your client at $100, but offer $150 in services; ideally this is done proactively so your client doesn't have time to start casting about for different services, but may be a defensive move to counter a competitive attack. At first blush, this approach would appear to work best in high margin industries; however, the extra $50 in service could come from faster delivery time, increased maintenance or preferential access to new products.

2) Focus on the bottom 20% of your client base - when was the last time you spoke with the client bring in $5 per year? How many of your products do they buy? Do they even know you offer other products? That $5 per year client could turn into a $20 or $25 per year client with minimal effort on the part of your sales team.

3) Organic new business development - at the start of our example, your $100 per year client is now a $50-60 per year client, leaving a $40-50 hole to fill. You might be able to fill in some of that hole by following strategy #2; however, the only way to get back to net zero or positive revenue growth is to seek out organizations that aren't doing business with your organization. Yes, your competitors clients are the easiest place to start (how happy is their bottom 20%?); however, a quick rethink of how you position your services should open up at least one new target market for you to pursue.

"Blue ocean strategy" is on the way to being a business cliche, but the reason phrases become cliches is there was some truth to them once. Being the first to reposition your products into new a market forces your competitor to act defensively, allowing you to take your competitors' clients who are being ignored in your original market and make further plans for new business growth.

How is your organization attempting to maintain or grow in this economy?

Over qualified

One of the biggest reasons ideas fail to sell is because they are over qualified. Think of the times you have used or heard the following phrases at work.

"These are my thoughts, you can take them or leave them"

"Here's what I think, do what you will"

"Do what you will with my input"

"Its only my idea"

With the first three, what I do with the idea is flush it, usually before the individual is finished speaking. If someone can't own their thoughts, I have no interest in whatever comes after their qualifier.

With the last one, I want to jump up, grab the individual pitching and scream, "THAT'S GREAT! ITS ONLY YOUR IDEA! YOU DON'T HAVE TO SHARE CREDIT WITH ANYONE!" Fortunately for my colleagues and clients, I have restrained myself so far.

Instead of enhancing your idea pitch, qualifiers communicate your lack of belief in your idea to your audience. 

If your idea is well thought out, your pitch doesn't need any qualifications, you are qualified to pitch already.

So what?

To give your ideas the best chance of being sold answer the "so what"? 

It's not enough to know that 2+2 = 4, what you do with 4 provides real value to your organization.

Unfortunately for those of us trying to sell our ideas, our managers' time is short. Last year, at a presentaiton by Christensen Investor Relations in Calgary, the presenter mentioned a study showing CEOs will switch their attention every 60 seconds unless they see value in the infomation they are reviewing.

So how do you avoid being 1 (minute) and done with your manager next time you pitch an idea?

Someone, I really wish I could remember who, gave me the following system, which they called the "60 second report".

15 seconds - summarize current situation (shareholder revolt, product recall, quarterly earnings call)

30 seconds - identify 3 options for resolving current situation (the "what")

15 seconds - recommend 1 option for resolving current situation and why (the "so what")

Instead of just summarizing the current situation and staring blankly at our manager for direction, the 60 second report quickly gives our manager (who is probably dealing lots of other issues as well), some guidance on how to resolve the situation you're describing. 

As much as "Free Agent Nation" sounds exciting from an employee perspective, employers will look for their current crop of free agents to not only provide "what"s, but "so what"s to justify their investment.

Update on "what" versus "who"

Reading the excellent, "Good to Great" by Jim Collins, one of the 100 best business books of all time. 

As a previous post mentions, I feel the "what" is more important than the "who"; however, Collins talks at length about how the "who" is more important. 

Based on Collins definitions of "what" and "who", I feel the "what" is still more important as Collins talks about "getting the right people on the bus," which to me is a "what" that leads to a "who."

Thoughts?

Honestly

Our collective fear behind more personal information migrating to online databases isn't really the loss of privacy. Instead, our fear is that that information can strip away the lies we tell ourselves and expose our true selves, not to others, but to us. 

This thought slapped me across the face while reading Super Crunchers, by Ian Ayres. Ayres points out that Visa, based on purchase history, can predict with relative accuracy if a married couple will be divorced in 5 years. 

To most, this information probably carries a terrifying "big brother" connotation. On the other hand, wouldn't you want to know this information? Having watched several divorces unfold from the periphary, it seems most divorce announcements shocker the individual receiving divorce notice. What if, 5 years before you were served, you had a brief conversation with your Visa rep who adivsed you that you were on a path towards divorce? I would certainly be happy for the chance to correct the course of my marriage.

Let's leave what most consider "personal" information for a second. Anthony Bourdain writes in Kitchen Confidential about a server who showed up late for work after returning from vacation claiming that her plane was delayed. Her boss called the airline, discovered that the plane had arrived on time and promptly fired the server for lying. 

Today that server's boss wouldn't need to call, he could find arrival times on a myriad of websites.

With so much of our information available online or through easily sourced databases, our chances of getting caught in a lie are exponentially bigger than even 10 years ago. 

At the same time what are the mental and emotional costs of facing up to our true selves? To paraphrase Joe Thornley at the CPRS national conference in Halifax last June, I have one life online. 

Having one life would make it easier to be truthful. What do you think?